Article content

Provincial and territorial finance ministers recently met with federal Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland to discuss a hot topic — Alberta’s potential withdrawal from the Canada Pension Plan (CPP). According to Nova Scotia Finance Minister Allan MacMaster, “there was real consensus” from his peers that they want Alberta to stay in the CPP. This is unsurprising; while an Alberta pension plan would benefit Albertans, it would come at great cost to the rest of Canada.

Advertisement 2

Article content

Why might Albertans want to leave the CPP?

Article content

Albertans pay a basic CPP contribution rate of 9.9%, typically deducted from their paycheques. According to a report commissioned by the Smith government, that rate would fall to 5.91% for a new CPP-like provincial program for Albertans, which means each Albertan would save up to $2,850 in 2027 (the first year of the hypothetical Alberta plan) while maintaining the same retirement benefits. In sharp contrast, to keep the CPP afloat without Alberta, the basic contribution rate for the rest of Canada would increase to 10.36%. In other words, smaller paycheques for the rest of Canada.

The report’s calculation is based on several assumptions, which some analysts have criticized, arguing Alberta’s estimated share of CPP assets — $334 billion — is not fair or realistic. To be clear, this share (equal to 53% of the CPP) is based on specific legislation that governs the withdrawal of any province from the CPP. But, even if the share of assets to Alberta were much lower, the province would benefit from reduced contribution rates with an Alberta pension plan.

Article content

Advertisement 3

Article content

For instance, if Alberta left the CPP and received merely 25% of the CPP’s assets in 2025 ($150 billion), the contribution rate in Alberta would fall from 9.9% to 7.8%, which would mean $1,086 in savings annually per Albertan. Meanwhile, the contribution rate for the rest of Canada would have to increase. If you dropped Alberta’s share to 20% ($120 billion in 2025), Alberta’s contribution rate would fall to 8.2%, equivalent to approximately $836 in savings annually per Albertan.

Put differently, even if Alberta’s share of assets were less than half the report’s estimate, Albertans would benefit from lower contribution rates for the exact same benefits while the rest of Canada may pay higher contributions to maintain current benefits.

Advertisement 4

Article content

Why does Alberta mean so much to the CPP?

Because Alberta generally has higher employment rates and a comparatively younger population, which means more workers pay into the fund and less retirees take from it. Albertans also have higher average incomes, which means there’s a higher level of premiums paid into the fund. As such, Albertans have paid significantly more into the CPP than its retirees have received in return.

It’s not surprising the rest of Canada doesn’t want Alberta to leave the CPP for an equivalent provincial plan because — even if Alberta’s share is less than $334 billion, Alberta’s withdrawal would come with big costs for other Canadians across the country.

Tegan Hill is associate director of Alberta policy at the Fraser Institute

Article content


Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.

By admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *